People v. Otigho

116 A.D.3d 794, 982 N.Y.S.2d 919
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Otigho. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.3d 637

Opinion

— Application by Christopher Otigho for a writ of error coram nobis on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel in connection with two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 2, 2011, and April 18, 2011, respectively.

Ordered that the application is denied without prejudice to seeking any appropriate relief pursuant to People v Syville (15 NY3d 391 [2010]).

Christopher Otigho has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Otigho, 116 A.D.3d 794, 982 N.Y.S.2d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

116 A.D.3d 794 (People v. Otigho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Syville
938 N.E.2d 910 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)