People v. Otero

48 A.D.3d 318, 852 N.Y.S.2d 88

This text of 48 A.D.3d 318 (People v. Otero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Otero, 48 A.D.3d 318, 852 N.Y.S.2d 88 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. Silver-man, J.), entered on or about October 11, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a risk level three offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[319]*319Defendant, who does not contest the assessment of 165 points, well over the 110-point threshold for a level-three adjudication, asks this Court to reclassify him as a level one sex offender. We perceive no basis for a discretionary downward departure (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Defendant’s educational and professional achievements are outweighed by the serious nature of his crimes, the age and number of victims, his prior record and his 1998 parole violation. Defendant has not shown that his academic degrees and credentials as a counselor would prevent him from reoffending; we note that defendant relapsed into substance abuse in 1998, after already becoming a counselor. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Guaman
8 A.D.3d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 318, 852 N.Y.S.2d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-otero-nyappdiv-2008.