People v. Osuchowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Osuchowski

269 A.D.2d 866, 703 N.Y.S.2d 771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 2000

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 866 (People v. Osuchowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Osuchowski, 269 A.D.2d 866, 703 N.Y.S.2d 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, the judgment convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.10) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, the judgment convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and falsifying business records in the first degree (Penal Law § 175.10) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Brunetti, J. — Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 866, 703 N.Y.S.2d 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-osuchowski-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack