People v. Osinoiki

204 A.D.2d 743, 614 N.Y.S.2d 260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Osinoiki. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 781

Opinion

—Application by the appellant for: (1) a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated April 20, 1992 (People v Osinoiki, 182 AD2d 781), affirming a judgment of the Supreme [744]*744Court, Kings County, rendered April 4, 1989, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; (2) reargument of the appeal from the judgment dated April 4, 1989, and assignment of counsel to prosecute reargument; (3) an order directing the disclosure of the Grand Jury minutes in connection with Indictment No. 2052/87; and (4) other related relief.

Ordered that the branch of the application which was for a writ of error coram nobis is denied on the ground that the defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745); and it is further,

Ordered that the remaining portions of the defendant’s application are denied in all respects. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Osinoiki, 204 A.D.2d 743, 614 N.Y.S.2d 260 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

204 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Osinoiki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Osinoiki
182 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)