People v. Osbourne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Osbourne

84 A.D.3d 979, 921 N.Y.S.2d 889

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Osbourne. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 A.D.3d 764 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2011·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 12, 2010 (People v Osbourne, 69 AD3d 764 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered May 23, 2007.

[980]*980Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, PJ., Mastro, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 12, 2010 (People v Osbourne, 69 AD3d 764 [2010]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered May 23, 2007.

[980]*980Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, PJ., Mastro, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

People v. Osbourne, 84 A.D.3d 979, 921 N.Y.S.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

84 A.D.3d 979 (People v. Osbourne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related