People v. Osborne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Osborne

133 A.D.2d 855, 520 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 855 (People v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Osborne, 133 A.D.2d 855, 520 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered January 5, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who has interposed no challenge to his plea of guilty, acknowledged during the plea allocution that no promise was being made concerning sentence and that he understood he could receive a sentence of up to seven years. He therefore cannot be heard to complain that an alleged off-the-record "promise” by the prosecutor of a 2- to 4-year term induced his plea (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, cert denied 419 US 1122). The defendant’s present claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is not established by the record and should have been raised by a collateral or postjudgment motion (cf., People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852). Finally, we do not find that the sentence imposed is harsh or excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered January 5, 1987, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, who has interposed no challenge to his plea of guilty, acknowledged during the plea allocution that no promise was being made concerning sentence and that he understood he could receive a sentence of up to seven years. He therefore cannot be heard to complain that an alleged off-the-record "promise” by the prosecutor of a 2- to 4-year term induced his plea (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, cert denied 419 US 1122). The defendant’s present claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is not established by the record and should have been raised by a collateral or postjudgment motion (cf., People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852). Finally, we do not find that the sentence imposed is harsh or excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 855, 520 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-osborne-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack