People v. Osborn
221 A.D.2d 1018, 635 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13560
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1995·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Because the alleged instance of trial counsel’s ineffective representation involves matters outside the record, it cannot be addressed on direct appeal (see, People v Simmons, 221 AD2d 994 [decided herewith]; People v Williams, 216 AD2d 945; People v Brown, 190 AD2d 510, lv denied 81 NY2d 968). (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.—Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Osborn, 221 A.D.2d 1018, 635 N.Y.S.2d 553, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
221 A.D.2d 1018 (People v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Brown
190 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Williams
216 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Simmons
221 A.D.2d 994 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)