People v. Osantowski
This text of 741 N.W.2d 383 (People v. Osantowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Andrew Paul OSANTOWSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall address whether, under MCL 777.49a, a threat must itself constitute an "act of terrorism," as defined by MCL 750.543b, in order for 100 points to be assessed under OV 20. The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing this limited issue. The parties should avoid submitting *384 mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
741 N.W.2d 383, 480 Mich. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-osantowski-mich-2007.