People v. Ortiz

139 A.D.3d 448, 29 N.Y.S.3d 184
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ortiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.3d 430
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 2016·No. 5788/12 1078 3245/13 1077·Published

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from the judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered on or about April 22, 2014, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 139 A.D.3d 448, 29 N.Y.S.3d 184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 448 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.