People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ortiz

42 A.D.2d 931, 347 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ortiz, 42 A.D.2d 931, 347 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered April 28, 1972, convicting defendant after trial of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal posession of stolen property in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him to prison for an indeterminate term of five years on the burglary count and to concurrent unconditional discharges on the other counts, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the count for petit larceny, and otherwise affirmed. The defendant stands convicted of both petit larceny and criminal possession of the same object. This is contrary to subdivision 2 of section 165.60 of the Penal Law. The count in the indictment for the larceny is accordingly dismissed. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lane, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered April 28, 1972, convicting defendant after trial of burglary in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal posession of stolen property in the third degree and possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him to prison for an indeterminate term of five years on the burglary count and to concurrent unconditional discharges on the other counts, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the count for petit larceny, and otherwise affirmed. The defendant stands convicted of both petit larceny and criminal possession of the same object. This is contrary to subdivision 2 of section 165.60 of the Penal Law. The count in the indictment for the larceny is accordingly dismissed. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Lane, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 931, 347 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ortiz-nyappdiv-1973.