People v. Ortega

2019 NY Slip Op 1154
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ortega. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 N.Y.S.3d 719
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 2019·No. 8412 3102/10·Published

Opinion

People v Ortega (2019 NY Slip Op 01154)
People v Ortega
2019 NY Slip Op 01154
Decided on February 14, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 14, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Webber, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

8412 3102/10

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Hiram Ortega, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Siobhan C. Atkins of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Joshua P. Weiss of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of resentence, of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), rendered June 8, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 14, 2019

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortega, 2019 NY Slip Op 1154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 1154 (People v. Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431