People v. Ortega

121 A.D.3d 622, 994 N.Y.S.2d 307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ortega. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.3d 797
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2014·No. 1565/04 13371 13370·Published

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padro, J.) rendered April 5, 2013, as amended April 10, 2013, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from judgment of resentence, same court and Justice, rendered July 13, 2012, unanimously dismissed as subsumed in the appeal from the April 10, 2013 amended judgment of resentencing.

The resentencing was properly limited to correcting the error in defendant’s original sentence, where the sentencing court failed to place on the record that defendant’s sentences would all run concurrently with a separate, already-imposed misdemeanor sentence. This procedural correction did not authorize the court to revisit the appropriateness of defendant’s original sentence (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 634-635 [2011]; see also CPL 430.10).

In any event, we find no basis for reducing the sentence. We note that on defendant’s direct appeal (70 AD3d 416, 418 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 808 [2010]), this Court upheld the same sentence, both on the ground of defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal, and alternatively on the merits.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortega, 121 A.D.3d 622, 994 N.Y.S.2d 307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 622 (People v. Ortega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Ortega
70 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)