People v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. O'Rourke

91 A.D.3d 424, 935 N.Y.2d 512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 424 (People v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. O'Rourke, 91 A.D.3d 424, 935 N.Y.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, his claim that the court should have imposed a lesser sentence is devoid of merit and we decline to reduce his sentence in the interest of justice. Under the terms of the DTAP agreement, defendant’s inadequate compliance exposed him to an even longer sentence than the court actually imposed. Concur— Gonzalez, RJ., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, his claim that the court should have imposed a lesser sentence is devoid of merit and we decline to reduce his sentence in the interest of justice. Under the terms of the DTAP agreement, defendant’s inadequate compliance exposed him to an even longer sentence than the court actually imposed. Concur— Gonzalez, RJ., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.3d 424, 935 N.Y.2d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-orourke-nyappdiv-2012.