People v. Orneval

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Orneval

141 A.D.2d 771, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.D.2d 771 (People v. Orneval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Orneval, 141 A.D.2d 771, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from three sentences of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), all imposed January 20, 1987.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s constitutional challenge to the sentences imposed is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, a review of the record does not support the defendant’s contention that the sentences in this case were “so grossly disproportionate” that it may be declared that the statutory scheme was unconstitutionally applied to the defendant (see, People v Donovan, 59 NY2d 834; People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 117, cert denied 423 US 950). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from three sentences of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), all imposed January 20, 1987.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s constitutional challenge to the sentences imposed is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, a review of the record does not support the defendant’s contention that the sentences in this case were “so grossly disproportionate” that it may be declared that the statutory scheme was unconstitutionally applied to the defendant (see, People v Donovan, 59 NY2d 834; People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, 117, cert denied 423 US 950). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.2d 771, 529 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-orneval-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack