People v. Ores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ores

108 A.D.2d 931, 485 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 108 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Ores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ores, 108 A.D.2d 931, 485 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered September 23,1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s brief contains matters which are dehors the record and, thus, may not be considered on appeal by this court (People v Johnson, 73 AD2d 652; Mulligan v Lackey, 33 AD2d 991; Matter of Niagara County Water Dist. v Board of Assessors, 31 AD2d 1004). The record on appeal is insufficient to support the defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was a product of coercion.

We have reviewed the other contentions raised by appellate counsel and by defendant pro se and find them to be without merit (see, e.g., People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80; People v Junco, 43 AD2d 266, affd 35 NY2d 419, cert denied 421 US 951). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered September 23,1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s brief contains matters which are dehors the record and, thus, may not be considered on appeal by this court (People v Johnson, 73 AD2d 652; Mulligan v Lackey, 33 AD2d 991; Matter of Niagara County Water Dist. v Board of Assessors, 31 AD2d 1004). The record on appeal is insufficient to support the defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was a product of coercion.

We have reviewed the other contentions raised by appellate counsel and by defendant pro se and find them to be without merit (see, e.g., People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80; People v Junco, 43 AD2d 266, affd 35 NY2d 419, cert denied 421 US 951). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 931, 485 N.Y.S.2d 824, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ores-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack