People v. Orenzo
This text of 202 A.D.2d 693 (People v. Orenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered January 6, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In the early morning hours of April 6, 1991, the defendant, encouraged by the codefendant Jose Santiago, chased a third man into a bodega on Fulton Street in Brooklyn, and shot him with a handgun. The victim eventually died of the gunshot wound to his head and brain.
In the challenge to his conviction, the defendant claims that he was deprived of a fair trial because of the prosecutor’s comments during summation. The defendant’s claims are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Santiago, 199 AD2d 290; CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947; People v Balls, 69 NY2d 641, 642; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818, 819; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 401; People v Arce, 42 NY2d 179, 190).
Finally, the defendant’s sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D.2d 693, 610 N.Y.S.2d 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-orenzo-nyappdiv-1994.