People v. O'Reilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. O'Reilly

200 A.D.2d 452, 608 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 452 (People v. O'Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. O'Reilly, 200 A.D.2d 452, 608 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered October 30, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), the jury’s determination of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of the criminal sale charge is amply supported (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Any credibility issue was for [453]*453the jury to resolve. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Cohen, J.), rendered October 30, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), the jury’s determination of defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of the criminal sale charge is amply supported (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Any credibility issue was for [453]*453the jury to resolve. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kupferman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 452, 608 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oreilly-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack