People v. Ordonez
415 N.E.2d 978, 51 N.Y.2d 897, 434 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2894
This text of 415 N.E.2d 978 (People v. Ordonez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Ordonez, 415 N.E.2d 978, 51 N.Y.2d 897, 434 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2894 (N.Y. 1980).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. It cannot be said that the Trial Judge abused his discretion in allowing cross-examination of defendant of the scope that he did, or that defendant has not had a fair trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
415 N.E.2d 978, 51 N.Y.2d 897, 434 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ordonez-ny-1980.