People v. Ordner

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Ordner

218 N.E.2d 703, 17 N.Y.2d 898, 271 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1298

DecidedJune 9, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 703 (People v. Ordner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ordner, 218 N.E.2d 703, 17 N.Y.2d 898, 271 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1298 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered upon the ground that there is insufficient proof of the underlying felony. On the new trial there should not be a repetition of the error committed when the arresting officer was allowed to testify that before the arrest he had been shown in the police station a photograph of defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voobhis, Beegan and Keating. Judges Bubke and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered upon the ground that there is insufficient proof of the underlying felony. On the new trial there should not be a repetition of the error committed when the arresting officer was allowed to testify that before the arrest he had been shown in the police station a photograph of defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voobhis, Beegan and Keating. Judges Bubke and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 N.E.2d 703, 17 N.Y.2d 898, 271 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ordner-ny-1966.