People v. Orama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Orama

265 A.D.2d 216, 696 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10362

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 216 (People v. Orama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Orama, 265 A.D.2d 216, 696 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered February 9, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the People’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find the challenged remarks to be based on the evidence and responsive to the defense summation (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered February 9, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the People’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find the challenged remarks to be based on the evidence and responsive to the defense summation (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 216, 696 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-orama-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack