People v. O'Quinn

119 A.D.2d 595, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55528
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. O'Quinn. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 A.D.2d 736

Opinion

— Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.), dated November 14, 1984, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant’s motion to suppress certain physical evidence and statements allegedly made by him.

[596]*596Order affirmed.

Under the circumstances herein, Criminal Term properly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress the gun found on his person and his subsequent statements as the fruits of an unlawful search (cf. People v Marsh, 20 NY2d 98; People v Randall, 85 AD2d 754). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. O'Quinn, 119 A.D.2d 595, 500 N.Y.S.2d 1002, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

119 A.D.2d 595 (People v. O'Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marsh
228 N.E.2d 783 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Randall
85 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)