People v. Oquendo

17 A.D.3d 701, 792 N.Y.S.2d 918
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 8, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to vacate his plea of guilty, without a hearing. The defendant’s conclusory allegations that he was innocent and that he was coerced by the codefendant and the codefendant’s family were belied by the plea proceedings and were insufficient to warrant vacatur of the plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]; People v Potter, 294 AD2d 603, 604 [2002]; People v Dunbar, 260 AD2d 644 [1999]; People v Barnett, 258 AD2d 526 [1999]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oquendo, 17 A.D.3d 701, 792 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

17 A.D.3d 701 (People v. Oquendo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Najera
2019 NY Slip Op 1620 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)