People v. Oniha

291 A.D.2d 414, 736 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1263

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered December 21, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly modified its Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371), in light of the testimony presented by the defense (see, People v Rodriguez, 85 NY2d 586, 591; People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646; People v McElroy, 239 AD2d 521).

[415]*415The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Florio, J.P., O’Brien, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oniha, 291 A.D.2d 414, 736 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

291 A.D.2d 414 (People v. Oniha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fardan
628 N.E.2d 41 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Rodriguez
650 N.E.2d 1293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. McElroy
239 A.D.2d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)