People v. O'Neil
51 Cal. 91
Opinion
The action was commenced in 1872, and the case must, therefore, be determined irrespective of the provisions of the act of March 19, 1874. (Reis v. Graff ante.)
The appeal of defendant to the Board of Supervisors was taken regularly and in proper time, and should have been entertained. The Board had no power to dismiss this appeal, and it must be regarded as still pending. It results that the assessment has not become a finality, and the action was prematurely instituted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. O'Neil, 51 Cal. 91 (Cal. 1875).
51 Cal. 91 (People v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal Construction Co. v. Kneese
174 P. 694 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)
Girvin v. Simon
59 P. 945 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Buckman v. Landers
43 P. 1125 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Williams v. Bergin
41 P. 287 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Mahoney v. Braverman
54 Cal. 565 (California Supreme Court, 1880)