People v. Oneal

158 N.Y.S.3d 632, 202 A.D.3d 710, 2022 NY Slip Op 00682
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2022
DocketInd. No. 700/18
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 N.Y.S.3d 632 (People v. Oneal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Oneal, 158 N.Y.S.3d 632, 202 A.D.3d 710, 2022 NY Slip Op 00682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Oneal (2022 NY Slip Op 00682)
People v Oneal
2022 NY Slip Op 00682
Decided on February 2, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 2, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2020-02400
(Ind. No. 700/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kelvin Oneal, appellant.


Thomas T. Keating, Dobbs Ferry, NY, for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Kevin C. King and Michael J. Balch of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (William O'Brien, J.), rendered October 18, 2019, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), assault in the third degree (two counts), and leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contentions that the County Court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony, and that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Campbell, 192 AD3d 822, 823; cf. People v Garcia, 189 AD3d 879).

BARROS, J.P., RIVERA, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lewin
2025 NY Slip Op 06731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Leach
2025 NY Slip Op 01642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 N.Y.S.3d 632, 202 A.D.3d 710, 2022 NY Slip Op 00682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oneal-nyappdiv-2022.