Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. O'Meara

People v. O'Meara

420 N.E.2d 85, 52 N.Y.2d 990, 438 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2224
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1981·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division- should be affirmed.

We agree with that court, and for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision (70 AD2d 890), that the October 15,1976 amendment of the wiretap warrant to cover bribe-related conversations was not obtained “as soon as practicable” as required by the statute (CPL 700.65, subd 4). Accordingly, evidence seized pursuant to . that amendment was properly suppressed.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. O'Meara, 420 N.E.2d 85, 52 N.Y.2d 990, 438 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2224 (N.Y. 1981).

420 N.E.2d 85 (People v. O'Meara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DeMieri
171 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Winograd
502 N.E.2d 189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Paluska
109 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Cicero
121 Misc. 2d 569 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Gallina
95 A.D.2d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)