People v. Olstin
This text of 171 A.D.2d 889 (People v. Olstin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered May 5, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury a circumstantial evidence charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dawson, 115 AD2d 612), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375).
The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A.D.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-olstin-nyappdiv-1991.