People v. Oliveri

68 A.D.3d 422, 888 N.Y.2d 879
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Oliveri. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 A.D.3d 1208

Opinion

The motion court properly excluded the period from December 16, 2002 (when a felony complaint was filed in the instant case) through February 3, 2003 (when the People answered ready), and that ruling is dispositive of the speedy trial motion. Defendant was on trial on a homicide indictment through January 17, 2003 and was sentenced in that case on March 17, 2003. “[A] 11 proceedings up until the imposition of sentence are excludable” pursuant to CPL 30.30 (4) (a) (People v Boyd, 189 AD2d 433, 437 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 714 [1993]). Furthermore, the delay was reasonable. With respect to the period up to the January 17 verdict in the homicide trial, it would have been impractical for defendant to be on trial in two separate cases at the same time, and with respect to the period from the verdict to February 3, that wasi “a reasonable period of delay resulting from . . . trial of other charges” within the meaning of CPL 30.30 (4) (a) (emphasis added) (see People v Osorio, 39 AD3d 400 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 925 [2007]; People v Fleming, 13 AD3d 102 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 788 [2005]). Concur— Gonzalez, PJ., Sweeny, Nardelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oliveri, 68 A.D.3d 422, 888 N.Y.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 422 (People v. Oliveri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Osorio
39 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Boyd
189 A.D.2d 433 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)