People v. Oliver

278 A.D.2d 847, 718 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Oliver. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 A.D.2d 930

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, contrary to defendant’s contention, the People provided County Court with a special information indicating that defendant had previously been convicted of a crime, and defendant admitted that he had been so convicted. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — Violation of Probation.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oliver, 278 A.D.2d 847, 718 N.Y.S.2d 690, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 847 (People v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)