People v. Oliver

41 A.D.2d 676, 341 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Oliver. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 A.D.2d 775

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant,. as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 7, 1972, upon a conviction, of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon a guilty pléa. Defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of not more than three years, with a recommendation that he receive medical' treatment. Sentence reversed, .on the law, and case remanded to the Criminal Term' for- further proceedings not inconsistent with the views- herein set forth. At the time of the guilty pleading, the court had information before it which indicated that defendant" might be a drug addict and the court said that, if' defendant were an addict, it' could,- on sentencing, consider' the question whether defendant was entitled to rehabilitation for his addiction. Accordingly, defendant could not be sentenced ■ until there was -compliance with' sections 207 and 208 of-the Mental Hygiene-Law (People v. Marañen, 39 A.D 2d 589, affd. 31 N Y 2d 828). It appears from the record that the sentencing court may have been- influenced by misinformation with respect to whether defendant had applied to Project R. F. T. U. R. N. for rehabilitation. Rabin, P. J.; Hopkins,' Munder, Martuscello and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oliver, 41 A.D.2d 676, 341 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5044 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 676 (People v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.