People v. Oldacre

2018 NY Slip Op 3772
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 24, 2018
Docket107430
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3772 (People v. Oldacre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Oldacre, 2018 NY Slip Op 3772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Oldacre (2018 NY Slip Op 03772)
People v Oldacre
2018 NY Slip Op 03772
Decided on May 24, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 24, 2018

107430

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

ORVILLE A. OLDACRE, Appellant.


Calendar Date: April 3, 2018
Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ.

Craig Meyerson, Peru, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Christopher D. Horn of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Breslin, J.), rendered February 4, 2014 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of reckless endangerment in the first degree.

In satisfaction of an 11-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant to the agreed-upon sentence of 1⅓ to 4 years in prison and ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $282.45. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Therefore,

the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys , 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes , 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Mulvey and Rumsey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 3772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oldacre-nyappdiv-2018.