People v. Olazabal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Olazabal

284 A.D.2d 485, 726 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 485 (People v. Olazabal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Olazabal, 284 A.D.2d 485, 726 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered August 31, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight [486]*486of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered August 31, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight [486]*486of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 485, 726 N.Y.S.2d 870, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-olazabal-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack