People v. Okhayan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Okhayan

28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 793 (People v. Okhayan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Okhayan, 28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), rendered January 13, 2004, convicting him grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[794]*794Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of grand larceny in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]; Penal Law § 155.40 [1]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), rendered January 13, 2004, convicting him grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[794]*794Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of grand larceny in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]; Penal Law § 155.40 [1]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 793, 812 N.Y.S.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-okhayan-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack