People v. O'Keefe

New York Court of Appeals

People v. O'Keefe

117 N.E.2d 918, 306 N.Y. 744, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1098

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 21, 1954

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 117 N.E.2d 918 (People v. O'Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. O'Keefe, 117 N.E.2d 918, 306 N.Y. 744, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1098 (N.Y. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied.

Motion for amendment of the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal [745]*745Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz.: as to whether the rights of the defendants to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution were violated by certain communications between the County Judge and jurors, and by refusal of the County Court to grant to defendant O’Keefe a further adjournment of the trial. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of any defendant. [See 306 N. Y. 619.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied.

Motion for amendment of the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Questions under the Federal [745]*745Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz.: as to whether the rights of the defendants to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution were violated by certain communications between the County Judge and jurors, and by refusal of the County Court to grant to defendant O’Keefe a further adjournment of the trial. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of any defendant. [See 306 N. Y. 619.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 N.E.2d 918, 306 N.Y. 744, 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-okeefe-ny-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack