Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Okechukwu Okoronkwo

People v. Okechukwu Okoronkwo

121 A.D.3d 720, 992 N.Y.S.2d 898
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 2014·No. 2012-05926·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Collini, J.), imposed June 11, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes *721 review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]).

Eng, EJ., Mastro, Hall, Miller and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Okechukwu Okoronkwo, 121 A.D.3d 720, 992 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

121 A.D.3d 720 (People v. Okechukwu Okoronkwo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Stanley
99 A.D.3d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)