People v. Ohlrogge

13 N.Y.S. 814, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 969, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1692
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided April 6, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the prisoner surrendered himself after the forfeiture, and was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine, which has been paid, together with all the charges of the sheriff, and the district attorney certifies that the people have lost no rights, the application to vacate the judgment entered upon the forfeited recognizance should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ohlrogge, 13 N.Y.S. 814, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 969, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1692 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

13 N.Y.S. 814 (People v. Ohlrogge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Levy
34 N.Y. Crim. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)