People v. Ohlrogge

13 N.Y.S. 814, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 969, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1692
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 6, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 814 (People v. Ohlrogge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ohlrogge, 13 N.Y.S. 814, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 969, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1692 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the prisoner surrendered himself after the forfeiture, and was tried, convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine, which has been paid, together with all the charges of the sheriff, and the district attorney certifies that the people have lost no rights, the application to vacate the judgment entered upon the forfeited recognizance should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Levy
34 N.Y. Crim. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.Y.S. 814, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 969, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ohlrogge-nyctcompl-1891.