People v. O'Garro

293 A.D.2d 763, 741 N.Y.S.2d 447, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4106
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered January 7, 1999, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[764] Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied his right to a fair trial by a brief reference in the complainant’s testimony to an uncharged incident involving a slashing. The Supreme Court sustained the defendant’s objection, struck the offending testimony, and issued a prompt curative instruction (see People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865; People v Vincent, 250 AD2d 787). Consequently, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for á mistrial (see People v Santiago, supra; People v Ortega, 224 AD2d 552; People v Lockhart, 220 AD2d 690).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. O'Garro, 293 A.D.2d 763, 741 N.Y.S.2d 447, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 763 (People v. O'Garro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Petronio
34 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Benavides
16 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Kirk
12 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)