People v. Odom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Odom

11 A.D.3d 487, 782 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11564

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 2004·Published

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 11, 2000 (People v Odom, 278 AD2d 344 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 1, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 11, 2000 (People v Odom, 278 AD2d 344 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 1, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

People v. Odom, 11 A.D.3d 487, 782 N.Y.S.2d 368, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

11 A.D.3d 487 (People v. Odom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related