People v. Odom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Odom

39 A.D.2d 970, 333 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4208

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Odom, 39 A.D.2d 970, 333 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgement of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 25, 1971 on resentence, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from two orders of the same court, dated October 9, 1970 and November 23, 1970, respectively, dismissed. The order dated October 9, 1970 dismissed appellant’s motion for a reduction of sentence and the order dated November 23, 1970 granted appellant’s motion for reargument of the prior motion and adhered to the original decision. Such orders are not appealable. We have, however, considered appellant’s contentions as to the orders and, if the appeals from the orders were not being dismissed, we would affirm the orders. Rabin, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgement of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 25, 1971 on resentence, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from two orders of the same court, dated October 9, 1970 and November 23, 1970, respectively, dismissed. The order dated October 9, 1970 dismissed appellant’s motion for a reduction of sentence and the order dated November 23, 1970 granted appellant’s motion for reargument of the prior motion and adhered to the original decision. Such orders are not appealable. We have, however, considered appellant’s contentions as to the orders and, if the appeals from the orders were not being dismissed, we would affirm the orders. Rabin, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 970, 333 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-odom-nyappdiv-1972.