People v. Oathout

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Oathout

240 A.D. 739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 739 (People v. Oathout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Oathout, 240 A.D. 739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment of conviction reversed and a new trial granted, upon the ground of improper rulings. Evidence as to the relations between the complaining witness and men other than the defendant was admissible. The mother should not have been permitted to give the details of the alleged crime as stated to her by the complaining witness. Book entries in support of defendant’s alibi were improperly excluded. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss,, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction reversed and a new trial granted, upon the ground of improper rulings. Evidence as to the relations between the complaining witness and men other than the defendant was admissible. The mother should not have been permitted to give the details of the alleged crime as stated to her by the complaining witness. Book entries in support of defendant’s alibi were improperly excluded. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss,, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oathout-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack