People v. Oates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Oates

212 A.D.2d 916, 623 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1613

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 916 (People v. Oates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Oates, 212 A.D.2d 916, 623 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years. Defendant was allowed to enter his plea in satisfaction of a 12-count indictment knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed. Given these circumstances, as well as defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years. Defendant was allowed to enter his plea in satisfaction of a 12-count indictment knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed. Given these circumstances, as well as defendant’s criminal record, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 916, 623 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oates-nyappdiv-1995.