People v. Oakes
1 How. Pr. 195
Opinion
Defendant’s attorney seems to have omitted a material part of his case; he should show by affidavit that the taxation was opposed, and the items objected to were taxed under objection by the taxing officer.
Denied with costs, without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Oakes, 1 How. Pr. 195 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 How. Pr. 195 (People v. Oakes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lott v. Krakauer
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 60 (New York Marine Court, 1878)