People v. Nurse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nurse

64 A.D.2d 972, 408 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 972 (People v. Nurse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nurse, 64 A.D.2d 972, 408 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, each rendered December 2, 1975, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the [973]*973third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by (1) deleting therefrom the provision that the sentence imposed under count one of Indictment No. 457/1974 shall be served consecutively to the sentence imposed under count one of Indictment No. 72/1975 and (2) adding thereto a provision that the sentences imposed under the afore-mentioned two indictments are to be served concurrently. As so modified, judgments affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. We have considered the other points raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Latham, Damiani and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, each rendered December 2, 1975, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the [973]*973third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by (1) deleting therefrom the provision that the sentence imposed under count one of Indictment No. 457/1974 shall be served consecutively to the sentence imposed under count one of Indictment No. 72/1975 and (2) adding thereto a provision that the sentences imposed under the afore-mentioned two indictments are to be served concurrently. As so modified, judgments affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. We have considered the other points raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Latham, Damiani and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 972, 408 N.Y.S.2d 945, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nurse-nyappdiv-1978.