People v. Nunez

2019 NY Slip Op 46
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 2019
Docket3839/15 8006A 782/16 8006
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 46 (People v. Nunez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Nunez, 2019 NY Slip Op 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Nunez (2019 NY Slip Op 00046)
People v Nunez
2019 NY Slip Op 00046
Decided on January 3, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 3, 2019
Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

3839/15 8006A 782/16 8006

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Steven Nunez, Defendant-Appellant.


Christina Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Katherine M.A. Pecore of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell-Urban of counsel), for respondent.



Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered February 23, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of burglary in the third degree and attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of one year, unanimously affirmed.

Regardless of whether defendant validly waived his right to appeal, we find that the court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment (see People v Drayton , 39 NY2d 580 [1976]), in light of defendant's violation of the terms of his original plea agreement. Defendant both failed to complete a treatment program and committed a new felony. Moreover, the court extended leniency to defendant

despite his failure to comply with the agreement by sentencing him to concurrent terms.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 3, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Drayton
350 N.E.2d 377 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nunez-nyappdiv-2019.