People v. Nunez

112 A.D.3d 437, 975 N.Y.S.2d 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nunez. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 A.D.3d 1128

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 17, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Regardless of whether the court properly assessed defendant 15 points for infliction of physical injury, defendant still qualifies as a level two offender, and there is no basis for a discretionary downward departure to level one (see People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 409 [2010]). The underlying offense, committed against a child, was serious, and the mitigating factors cited by defendant were generally taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nunez, 112 A.D.3d 437, 975 N.Y.S.2d 871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

112 A.D.3d 437 (People v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pettigrew
927 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)