People v. Nunez

208 A.D.2d 567, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1015
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nunez. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 317

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered July 19, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that it was improper for the court to sentence him as a second felony offender without first conducting a hearing to determine the validity of his constitutional challenge to the predicate felony conviction and that accordingly, the matter should be remitted for such a hearing. We disagree.

A review of the sentencing minutes reveals that the defendant was neither adjudicated a second felony offender nor sentenced as one. Furthermore, the sentence imposed was a lawful sentence and is not harsh or excessive.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nunez, 208 A.D.2d 567, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 567 (People v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.