People v. Nugent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nugent

51 A.D.2d 1061, 381 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11888

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1061 (People v. Nugent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nugent, 51 A.D.2d 1061, 381 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed May 8, 1975, upon his conviction of various drug offenses, after a jury trial. In the interest of justice, the notice of appeal is treated as a premature notice of appeal from the resentence of the same court, imposed October 8, 1975 (see CPL 460.10, subd 6). Resentence affirmed. Although technically not before us on the appeal from the resentence (see CPL 450.10), we have considered the issues raised by the defendant pro se, which are addressed to the sufficiency of the conviction, and find [1062]*1062them to be lacking in • merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Christ, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed May 8, 1975, upon his conviction of various drug offenses, after a jury trial. In the interest of justice, the notice of appeal is treated as a premature notice of appeal from the resentence of the same court, imposed October 8, 1975 (see CPL 460.10, subd 6). Resentence affirmed. Although technically not before us on the appeal from the resentence (see CPL 450.10), we have considered the issues raised by the defendant pro se, which are addressed to the sufficiency of the conviction, and find [1062]*1062them to be lacking in • merit. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Christ, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1061, 381 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nugent-nyappdiv-1976.