People v. Nowakowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nowakowski

39 A.D.2d 621, 331 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 621 (People v. Nowakowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nowakowski, 39 A.D.2d 621, 331 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County, rendered April 30, 1969, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40). The gravamen of this crime is possession of stolen property with knowledge of its stolen character (Practice Commentary by Richard G. Denser and Peter McQuillan, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y. Book 39, Penal Law, § 165.40, p. 518). “A finding of carelessness, negligence or indolence in investigation is not a substitute for guilty knowledge ” (People v. Checkman, 284 App. Div. 44, 45), the correct test being actual knowledge, not negligence in failing to make reasonable inquiry (People v. Price, 19 A D 2d 730, cert. den. 390 U. S. 908). Here, there was no direct or circumstantial proof of actual knowledge and the prosecution did not meet its burden of submitting evidence on which the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant actually knew that the tires which he purchased were stolen. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Simons and Kane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County, rendered April 30, 1969, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40). The gravamen of this crime is possession of stolen property with knowledge of its stolen character (Practice Commentary by Richard G. Denser and Peter McQuillan, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y. Book 39, Penal Law, § 165.40, p. 518). “A finding of carelessness, negligence or indolence in investigation is not a substitute for guilty knowledge ” (People v. Checkman, 284 App. Div. 44, 45), the correct test being actual knowledge, not negligence in failing to make reasonable inquiry (People v. Price, 19 A D 2d 730, cert. den. 390 U. S. 908). Here, there was no direct or circumstantial proof of actual knowledge and the prosecution did not meet its burden of submitting evidence on which the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant actually knew that the tires which he purchased were stolen. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment dismissed. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Cooke, Simons and Kane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 621, 331 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nowakowski-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack