People v. Novoa

57 A.D.3d 231, 867 N.Y.2d 680

This text of 57 A.D.3d 231 (People v. Novoa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Novoa, 57 A.D.3d 231, 867 N.Y.2d 680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The court properly assessed points under the risk factor for drug and alcohol abuse, based on extensive evidence of persistent drug use including defendant’s own admissions to the Probation Department (see People v Conway, 47 AD3d 492 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 708 [2008]; People v Arnold, 35 AD3d 827 [2006], lv denied 9 NY3d 813 [2007]), and it providently exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Concur — Tom, J.E, Nardelli, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Guaman
8 A.D.3d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Arnold
35 A.D.3d 827 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Conway
47 A.D.3d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 231, 867 N.Y.2d 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-novoa-nyappdiv-2008.