People v. Novo

California Court of Appeal

People v. Novo

54 P.2d 62, 11 Cal. App. 2d 603, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 404

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 3, 1936

DocketCrim. No. 1484

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 P.2d 62 (People v. Novo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Novo, 54 P.2d 62, 11 Cal. App. 2d 603, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 404 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sonoma County of felonies, to wit: Assault and burglary in the second degree.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 3, 1936. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on February 3, 1936. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sonoma County of felonies, to wit: Assault and burglary in the second degree.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 3, 1936. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on February 3, 1936. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 P.2d 62, 11 Cal. App. 2d 603, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-novo-calctapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack